Starring - Josh Hutcherson (The Hunger Games, Ultraman), Piper Rubio (Robogobo, Project U Move), and Elizabeth Lail (You, Robot Chicken)
Release Date - 2025
Genre - Horror
Tagline - "You there?"
Format - UHD (Personal Collection) (Screener)
Rating (out of 5):
I'm an avid gamer and a horror fan. I love to game when I'm not watching movies and I love even more when the two worlds collide. I've been lucky enough to review a few horror video game adaptations with Resident Evil: Welcome to Racoon City, Silent Hill, The Last of Us, and Five Nights at Freddy's. I really enjoyed most of those adaptations but wasn't really a fan of Five Nights at Freddy's. The movie itself was very underwhelming to me. I was actually pretty excited for the film and found myself struggling to finish it. Fast forward to now and I was given the opportunity to watch the sequel. I was on the fence about checking it out but after watching the trailer, I decided to give it a chance. I'm glad I did because it was leagues better than the first film.
The film takes place one year after the first film. Mike (Hutcherson) is still struggling to provide for his little sister Abby (Rubio) after the horrific events they went through. However, the terror is not yet behind them as a sinister presence at the very first Freddy Fazbear's Pizza location tricks her into letting out the haunted animatronics and they begin killing adults that they think did them wrong.
I'm not going to say that Five Nights at Freddy's 2 is a contender for my favorite film of the year or any of that. It's far from perfect and I did have some issues with it but it was still a fun watch. I wish I would have liked it more than I did but it's an above average flick that somehow better than it has any right to be. The acting in this one is my biggest complaint. The film has characters that are extremely unlikable and the cast's performances are fairly lazy. The film's leads, Josh Hutcherson and Piper Rubio, act as if their hearts aren't in it. They have no energy for most of the film and the dialogue feels forced. Elizabeth Lail gives us a little bit more but it's still not impressive. She has a little more emotional range but is still stiff during a lot of her scenes. I don't know if the scenes were rushed or they just didn't have their heart in it but the acting in this one is very disappointing. The story for this one does pick up from where the first one left off but made it a bit more interesting. We get some back story on the disappearances and murders that took place decades ago before going deeper into the lore of Five Nights at Freddy's. With that being said, we have a lot of scenes that are unnecessarily long. They throw off what little bit of atmosphere the film tries to establish while making the film longer than it needed to be. Finally, the film has some blood but it's not that graphic which is what you would expect from a horror title with a PG-13 rating. I do like the visuals and the looks of the animatronics but that is about the extent of it for me. Overall, Five Nights at Freddy's is a better film than the first film but it's still a movie that is barely above average. The audience for this one is children and I think it works for them while playing fanfare to adults watching. It's a solid film but it's nothing memorable. Check it out especially if you want something to watch with your little ones.





























